Apodex 1.1 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Which is better for the money: Apodex 1.1 by Apodex or Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview by Google? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview scores 3.3 points higher (29.7 vs 26.4) but costs 2.1× as much to run the benchmark ($1935 vs $939; both premium class). Pick Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Apodex 1.1.
| Metric | Apodex 1.1 | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 26.4 | 29.7 | +12.5% Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is 12.5% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $939.06 | $1,935.39 | +106.1% Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is 2.1× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | Not reported | 24.47s | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $3.00 | $2.00 / $12.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Apodex 1.1: 12.5% more intelligence, 106.1% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Apodex 1.1 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Apodex 1.1Gemini 3.1 Pro PreviewToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/apodex-1-1/gemini-3-1-pro-preview · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/apodex-1-1/gemini-3-1-pro-preview?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill