Apodex 1.1 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash (High)
Which is better for the money: Apodex 1.1 by Apodex or Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) by Google? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) scores 6.2 points higher (32.6 vs 26.4) but costs 4.5× as much to run the benchmark ($4222 vs $939; flagship vs premium cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) when you need intelligence above 26.4, and Apodex 1.1 when 26.4 is enough.
| Metric | Apodex 1.1 | Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 26.4 | 32.6 | +23.5% Gemini 3.5 Flash (Hig… is 23.5% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $939.06 | $4,222.12 | +349.6% Gemini 3.5 Flash (Hig… is 4.5× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | Not reported | 16.65s | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $3.00 | $1.50 / $9.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) vs Apodex 1.1: 23.5% more intelligence, 349.6% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Apodex 1.1 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
Apodex 1.1Gemini 3.5 Flash (High)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/apodex-1-1/gemini-3-5-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/apodex-1-1/gemini-3-5-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill