Apodex 1.1 vs GLM-5.1 (Reasoning)
Which is better for the money: Apodex 1.1 by Apodex or GLM-5.1 (Reasoning) by Z AI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Apodex 1.1
GLM-5.1 (Reasoning) vs Apodex 1.1: 1.1% less intelligence, 58.3% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
| Metric | Apodex 1.1 | GLM-5.1 (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 26.4 | 26.1 | −1.1% GLM-5.1 (Reasoning) is 1.1% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $939.06 | $1,486.78 | +58.3% GLM-5.1 (Reasoning) is 58.3% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | Not reported | 60.66s | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $3.00 | $1.28 / $4.07 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Apodex 1.1 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- GLM-5.1 (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Apodex 1.1GLM-5.1 (Reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/apodex-1-1/glm-5-1 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/apodex-1-1/glm-5-1?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill