Apodex 1.1 vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
Which is better for the money: Apodex 1.1 by Apodex or Kimi K3.1 Pro by Kimi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 28.7 points higher (55.1 vs 26.4) but costs 3.3× as much to run the benchmark ($3117 vs $939; flagship vs premium cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Kimi K3.1 Pro when you need intelligence above 26.4, and Apodex 1.1 when 26.4 is enough.
| Metric | Apodex 1.1 | Kimi K3.1 Pro | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 26.4 | 55.1 | +108.7% Kimi K3.1 Pro is 2.1× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $939.06 | $3,117.31 | +232.0% Kimi K3.1 Pro is 3.3× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | Not reported | 42.64s | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $3.00 | $2.00 / $10.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Apodex 1.1: 108.7% more intelligence, 232.0% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Apodex 1.1 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- Kimi K3.1 Pro is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
Apodex 1.1Kimi K3.1 ProToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/apodex-1-1/kimi-k3-1-pro · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/apodex-1-1/kimi-k3-1-pro?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill