Apodex 1.1 vs Mercury 2
Which is better for the money: Apodex 1.1 by Apodex or Mercury 2 by Inception? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Apodex 1.1 scores 15.6 points higher (26.4 vs 10.8) but costs 8.9× as much to run the benchmark ($939 vs $105; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Apodex 1.1 when you need intelligence above 10.8, and Mercury 2 when 10.8 is enough.
| Metric | Apodex 1.1 | Mercury 2 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 26.4 | 10.8 | −59.1% Mercury 2 is 59.1% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $939.06 | $104.94 | −88.8% Mercury 2 is 88.8% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | Not reported | 6.65s | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $3.00 | $0.25 / $0.75 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Mercury 2 vs Apodex 1.1: 59.1% less intelligence, 88.8% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Apodex 1.1 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- Mercury 2 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (High) scores 37.80 for $94.1.
Apodex 1.1Mercury 2Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/apodex-1-1/mercury-2 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/apodex-1-1/mercury-2?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill