Apodex 1.1 vs Qwen3.6 27B (Reasoning)
Which is better for the money: Apodex 1.1 by Apodex or Qwen3.6 27B (Reasoning) by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Apodex 1.1
Qwen3.6 27B (Reasoning) vs Apodex 1.1: 18.9% less intelligence, 22.0% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
| Metric | Apodex 1.1 | Qwen3.6 27B (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 26.4 | 21.4 | −18.9% Qwen3.6 27B (Reasonin… is 18.9% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $939.06 | $1,145.36 | +22.0% Qwen3.6 27B (Reasonin… is 22.0% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | Not reported | 110.87s | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $3.00 | $0.60 / $3.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Apodex 1.1 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- Qwen3.6 27B (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Apodex 1.1Qwen3.6 27B (Reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/apodex-1-1/qwen3-6-27b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/apodex-1-1/qwen3-6-27b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill