Apodex 1.1 vs Qwen3.7 Plus
Which is better for the money: Apodex 1.1 by Apodex or Qwen3.7 Plus by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Apodex 1.1 scores 1.2 points higher (26.4 vs 25.2) but costs 2.2× as much to run the benchmark ($939 vs $428; premium vs mid-range cost classes). Pick Apodex 1.1 when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Qwen3.7 Plus.
| Metric | Apodex 1.1 | Qwen3.7 Plus | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 26.4 | 25.2 | −4.5% Qwen3.7 Plus is 4.5% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $939.06 | $427.73 | −54.5% Qwen3.7 Plus is 54.5% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | Not reported | 45.52s | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $3.00 | $0.40 / $1.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Qwen3.7 Plus vs Apodex 1.1: 4.5% less intelligence, 54.5% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Apodex 1.1 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- Qwen3.7 Plus is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
Apodex 1.1Qwen3.7 PlusToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/apodex-1-1/qwen3-7-plus · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/apodex-1-1/qwen3-7-plus?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill