Apodex 1.1 vs Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reasoning)
Which is better for the money: Apodex 1.1 by Apodex or Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reasoning) by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Apodex 1.1
Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reasoning) vs Apodex 1.1: 23.5% less intelligence, 115.4% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
| Metric | Apodex 1.1 | Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 26.4 | 20.2 | −23.5% Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reas… is 23.5% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $938.99 | $2,022.49 | +115.4% Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reas… is 2.2× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | Not reported | 13.84s | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $3.00 | $0.50 / $3.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Apodex 1.1 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Apodex 1.1Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/apodex-1-1/qwen3-8-27b-non-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/apodex-1-1/qwen3-8-27b-non-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill