Apodex 1.1 vs Beam 1.0
Which is better for the money: Apodex 1.1 by Apodex or Beam 1.0 by Reflection? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Beam 1.0
Beam 1.0 vs Apodex 1.1: 14.8% more intelligence, 66.1% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
| Metric | Apodex 1.1 | Beam 1.0 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 26.4 | 30.3 | +14.8% Beam 1.0 is 14.8% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $939.06 | $318.73 | −66.1% Beam 1.0 is 66.1% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | Not reported | 8.02s | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $3.00 | $0.40 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Apodex 1.1 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- Beam 1.0 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
Apodex 1.1Beam 1.0Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/apodex-1-1/reflection-beam · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/apodex-1-1/reflection-beam?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill