Apodex 1.1 vs Solar Mini 4
Which is better for the money: Apodex 1.1 by Apodex or Solar Mini 4 by Upstage? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Apodex 1.1 scores 2.3 points higher (26.4 vs 24.1) but costs 1.9× as much to run the benchmark ($939 vs $502; both premium class). Pick Apodex 1.1 when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Solar Mini 4.
| Metric | Apodex 1.1 | Solar Mini 4 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 26.4 | 24.1 | −8.7% Solar Mini 4 is 8.7% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $939.06 | $502.02 | −46.5% Solar Mini 4 is 46.5% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | Not reported | 27.46s | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $3.00 | $0.10 / $0.40 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Solar Mini 4 vs Apodex 1.1: 8.7% less intelligence, 46.5% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Apodex 1.1 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- Solar Mini 4 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
Apodex 1.1Solar Mini 4Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/apodex-1-1/solar-mini4 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/apodex-1-1/solar-mini4?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill