Celeris-1 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High)
Which is better for the money: Celeris-1 by Celeris or DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High) by DeepSeek? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High) scores 18.1 points higher (24.4 vs 6.3) but costs 2.0× as much to run the benchmark ($121 vs $60.0; both mid-range class). Pick DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Celeris-1.
| Metric | Celeris-1 | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 6.3 | 24.4 | +287.3% DeepSeek V4 Flash 042… is 3.9× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $59.99 | $121.20 | +102.0% DeepSeek V4 Flash 042… is 2.0× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 0.87s | Not reported | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.20 / $0.70 | $0.11 / $0.23 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High) vs Celeris-1: 287.3% more intelligence, 102.0% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Celeris-1 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) scores 34.50 for $56.4.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores 37.90 for $110.
Celeris-1DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/celeris-1/deepseek-v4-flash-0420-high · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/celeris-1/deepseek-v4-flash-0420-high?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill