Celeris-1 vs GPT-6.1 Terra (Low)
Which is better for the money: Celeris-1 by Celeris or GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) scores 29.9 points higher (36.2 vs 6.3) but costs 1.9× as much to run the benchmark ($115 vs $60.0; both mid-range class). Pick GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Celeris-1.
| Metric | Celeris-1 | GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 6.3 | 36.2 | +474.6% GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) is 5.7× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $59.99 | $114.52 | +90.9% GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) is 90.9% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 0.89s | 6.78s | +661.8% GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) is 661.8% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.20 / $0.70 | $1.00 / $5.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) vs Celeris-1: 474.6% more intelligence, 90.9% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 661.8% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Celeris-1 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) scores 34.50 for $56.4.
- GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores 37.90 for $110.
Celeris-1GPT-6.1 Terra (Low)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/celeris-1/gpt-6-1-terra-low · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/celeris-1/gpt-6-1-terra-low?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill