Celeris-1 vs GPT-6 Luna (Max)
Which is better for the money: Celeris-1 by Celeris or GPT-6 Luna (Max) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 31.8 points higher (38.1 vs 6.3) but costs 2.0× as much to run the benchmark ($122 vs $60.0; both mid-range class). Pick GPT-6 Luna (Max) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Celeris-1.
| Metric | Celeris-1 | GPT-6 Luna (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 6.3 | 38.1 | +504.8% GPT-6 Luna (Max) is 6.0× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $59.99 | $122.05 | +103.5% GPT-6 Luna (Max) is 2.0× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 0.87s | 82.02s | +9327.6% GPT-6 Luna (Max) is 9327.6% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.20 / $0.70 | $0.10 / $0.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
GPT-6 Luna (Max) vs Celeris-1: 504.8% more intelligence, 103.5% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 9327.6% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Celeris-1 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) scores 34.50 for $56.4.
- GPT-6 Luna (Max) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
Celeris-1GPT-6 Luna (Max)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/celeris-1/gpt-6-luna · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/celeris-1/gpt-6-luna?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill