Celeris-1 vs GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning)
Which is better for the money: Celeris-1 by Celeris or GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning) scores 22.2 points higher (28.5 vs 6.3) but costs 7.5× as much to run the benchmark ($449 vs $60.0; both mid-range class). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning) when you need intelligence above 6.3, and Celeris-1 when 6.3 is enough.
| Metric | Celeris-1 | GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 6.3 | 28.5 | +352.4% GPT-6 Sol (Non-reason… is 4.5× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $59.99 | $449.37 | +649.1% GPT-6 Sol (Non-reason… is 7.5× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 0.87s | 5.90s | +578.2% GPT-6 Sol (Non-reason… is 578.2% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.20 / $0.70 | $2.00 / $10.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning) vs Celeris-1: 352.4% more intelligence, 649.1% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 578.2% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Celeris-1 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) scores 34.50 for $56.4.
- GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
Celeris-1GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/celeris-1/gpt-6-sol-non-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/celeris-1/gpt-6-sol-non-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill