Celeris-1 vs Muse Spark 1.3 (Max)
Which is better for the money: Celeris-1 by Celeris or Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) scores 41.8 points higher (48.1 vs 6.3) but costs 33× as much to run the benchmark ($2000 vs $60.0; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) when you need intelligence above 6.3, and Celeris-1 when 6.3 is enough.
| Metric | Celeris-1 | Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 6.3 | 48.1 | +663.5% Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) is 7.6× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $59.99 | $2,000.35 | +3234.5% Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) is 33× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 0.87s | 72.17s | +8195.4% Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) is 8195.4% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.20 / $0.70 | $1.25 / $4.25 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) vs Celeris-1: 663.5% more intelligence, 3234.5% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 8195.4% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Celeris-1 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) scores 34.50 for $56.4.
- Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Celeris-1Muse Spark 1.3 (Max)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/celeris-1/muse-spark-1-3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/celeris-1/muse-spark-1-3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill