Celeris-1 vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Which is better for the money: Celeris-1 by Celeris or Qwen3 Coder Next by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-09-22.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Qwen3 Coder Next scores 2.9 points higher (9.2 vs 6.3) but costs 7.9× as much to run the benchmark ($476 vs $60.0; both mid-range class). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Qwen3 Coder Next when you need intelligence above 6.3, and Celeris-1 when 6.3 is enough.
| Metric | Celeris-1 | Qwen3 Coder Next | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 6.3 | 9.2 | +46.0% Qwen3 Coder Next is 46.0% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $59.99 | $476.23 | +693.8% Qwen3 Coder Next is 7.9× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 0.92s | 6.95s | +655.4% Qwen3 Coder Next is 655.4% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.20 / $0.70 | $0.35 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Qwen3 Coder Next vs Celeris-1: 46.0% more intelligence, 693.8% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 655.4% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Celeris-1 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-5.6 Luna (medium) scores 25.00 for $44.3.
- Qwen3 Coder Next is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
Celeris-1Qwen3 Coder NextToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/celeris-1/qwen3-coder-next · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/celeris-1/qwen3-coder-next?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill