Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) vs Gemini 3.5 Flash (High)
Which is better for the money: Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) by Anthropic or Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) by Google? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) scores 15.7 points higher (32.6 vs 16.9) but costs 7.1× as much to run the benchmark ($4222 vs $594; flagship vs premium cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) when you need intelligence above 16.9, and Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) when 16.9 is enough.
| Metric | Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) | Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 16.9 | 32.6 | +92.9% Gemini 3.5 Flash (Hig… is 92.9% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $594.08 | $4,222.12 | +610.7% Gemini 3.5 Flash (Hig… is 7.1× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 23.70s | 16.63s | −29.8% Gemini 3.5 Flash (Hig… is 29.8% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.00 / $5.00 | $1.50 / $9.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) vs Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning): 92.9% more intelligence, 610.7% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 29.8% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
- Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning)Gemini 3.5 Flash (High)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-4-5-haiku-reasoning/gemini-3-5-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-4-5-haiku-reasoning/gemini-3-5-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill