Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) vs Gemini 4 Argon (High)
Which is better for the money: Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) by Anthropic or Gemini 4 Argon (High) by Google? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 4 Argon (High) scores 35.7 points higher (52.6 vs 16.9) but costs 4.1× as much to run the benchmark ($2407 vs $594; flagship vs premium cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Gemini 4 Argon (High) when you need intelligence above 16.9, and Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) when 16.9 is enough.
| Metric | Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) | Gemini 4 Argon (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 16.9 | 52.6 | +211.2% Gemini 4 Argon (High) is 3.1× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $594.08 | $2,407.24 | +305.2% Gemini 4 Argon (High) is 4.1× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 23.70s | 64.86s | +173.7% Gemini 4 Argon (High) is 173.7% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.00 / $5.00 | $2.00 / $10.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Gemini 4 Argon (High) vs Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning): 211.2% more intelligence, 305.2% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 173.7% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
- Gemini 4 Argon (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) scores 53.60 for $2172.
Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning)Gemini 4 Argon (High)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-4-5-haiku-reasoning/gemini-4-argon · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-4-5-haiku-reasoning/gemini-4-argon?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill