Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) vs Qwen3.6 27B (Reasoning)
Which is better for the money: Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) by Anthropic or Qwen3.6 27B (Reasoning) by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Qwen3.6 27B (Reasoning) scores 4.5 points higher (21.4 vs 16.9) but costs 1.9× as much to run the benchmark ($1145 vs $594; both premium class). Pick Qwen3.6 27B (Reasoning) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning).
| Metric | Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) | Qwen3.6 27B (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 16.9 | 21.4 | +26.6% Qwen3.6 27B (Reasonin… is 26.6% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $594.08 | $1,145.36 | +92.8% Qwen3.6 27B (Reasonin… is 92.8% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 24.36s | 111.40s | +357.3% Qwen3.6 27B (Reasonin… is 357.3% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.00 / $5.00 | $0.60 / $3.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Qwen3.6 27B (Reasoning) vs Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning): 26.6% more intelligence, 92.8% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 357.3% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
- Qwen3.6 27B (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning)Qwen3.6 27B (Reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-4-5-haiku-reasoning/qwen3-6-27b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-4-5-haiku-reasoning/qwen3-6-27b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill