Claude 4.5 Sonnet (Reasoning) vs Llama 4 Scout
Which is better for the money: Claude 4.5 Sonnet (Reasoning) by Anthropic or Llama 4 Scout by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Claude 4.5 Sonnet (Reasoning) scores 14.2 points higher (20.7 vs 6.5) but costs 20× as much to run the benchmark ($1501 vs $73.6; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Claude 4.5 Sonnet (Reasoning) when you need intelligence above 6.5, and Llama 4 Scout when 6.5 is enough.
| Metric | Claude 4.5 Sonnet (Reasoning) | Llama 4 Scout | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 20.7 | 6.5 | −68.6% Llama 4 Scout is 68.6% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,501.22 | $73.56 | −95.1% Llama 4 Scout is 95.1% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 21.53s | 4.99s | −76.8% Llama 4 Scout is 76.8% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $3.00 / $15.0 | $0.18 / $0.66 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Llama 4 Scout vs Claude 4.5 Sonnet (Reasoning): 68.6% less intelligence, 95.1% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 76.8% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude 4.5 Sonnet (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Llama 4 Scout is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh) scores 34.60 for $66.8.
Claude 4.5 Sonnet (Reasoning)Llama 4 ScoutToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-4-5-sonnet-thinking/llama-4-scout · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-4-5-sonnet-thinking/llama-4-scout?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill