Claude 4.5 Sonnet (Reasoning) vs Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning)
Which is better for the money: Claude 4.5 Sonnet (Reasoning) by Anthropic or Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning) by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Claude 4.5 Sonnet (Reasoning) scores 5.1 points higher (20.7 vs 15.6) but costs 2.3× as much to run the benchmark ($1501 vs $661; both premium class). Pick Claude 4.5 Sonnet (Reasoning) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning).
| Metric | Claude 4.5 Sonnet (Reasoning) | Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 20.7 | 15.6 | −24.6% Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Re… is 24.6% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,501.22 | $661.29 | −55.9% Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Re… is 55.9% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 21.72s | 21.37s | −1.6% Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Re… is 1.6% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $3.00 / $15.0 | $0.40 / $3.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning) vs Claude 4.5 Sonnet (Reasoning): 24.6% less intelligence, 55.9% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 1.6% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude 4.5 Sonnet (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
Claude 4.5 Sonnet (Reasoning)Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-4-5-sonnet-thinking/qwen3-5-122b-a10b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-4-5-sonnet-thinking/qwen3-5-122b-a10b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill