Claude 4.5 Sonnet (Reasoning) vs Qwen3.5 9B (Reasoning)
Which is better for the money: Claude 4.5 Sonnet (Reasoning) by Anthropic or Qwen3.5 9B (Reasoning) by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Claude 4.5 Sonnet (Reasoning) scores 9.5 points higher (20.7 vs 11.2) but costs 4.6× as much to run the benchmark ($1501 vs $329; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Claude 4.5 Sonnet (Reasoning) when you need intelligence above 11.2, and Qwen3.5 9B (Reasoning) when 11.2 is enough.
| Metric | Claude 4.5 Sonnet (Reasoning) | Qwen3.5 9B (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 20.7 | 11.2 | −45.9% Qwen3.5 9B (Reasoning) is 45.9% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,501.22 | $328.86 | −78.1% Qwen3.5 9B (Reasoning) is 78.1% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 21.53s | 42.11s | +95.6% Qwen3.5 9B (Reasoning) is 95.6% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $3.00 / $15.0 | $0.14 / $0.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Qwen3.5 9B (Reasoning) vs Claude 4.5 Sonnet (Reasoning): 45.9% less intelligence, 78.1% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 95.6% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude 4.5 Sonnet (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Qwen3.5 9B (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
Claude 4.5 Sonnet (Reasoning)Qwen3.5 9B (Reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-4-5-sonnet-thinking/qwen3-5-9b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-4-5-sonnet-thinking/qwen3-5-9b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill