Claude Fable 5.1 (High, Default Fallback) vs Gemini 4 Carbon (Low)
Which is better for the money: Claude Fable 5.1 (High, Default Fallback) by Anthropic or Gemini 4 Carbon (Low) by Google? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-04.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Gemini 4 Carbon (Low)
Gemini 4 Carbon (Low) vs Claude Fable 5.1 (High, Default Fallback): 14.8% more intelligence, 13.5% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 43.1% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | Claude Fable 5.1 (High, Default Fallback) | Gemini 4 Carbon (Low) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 47.2 | 54.2 | +14.8% Gemini 4 Carbon (Low) is 14.8% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $6,617.89 | $5,725.02 | −13.5% Gemini 4 Carbon (Low) is 13.5% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 28.61s | 16.28s | −43.1% Gemini 4 Carbon (Low) is 43.1% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $10.0 / $50.0 | $4.00 / $20.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Fable 5.1 (High, Default Fallback) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Gemini 4 Carbon (Medium) scores 58.30 for $5903.
- Gemini 4 Carbon (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 57.40 for $4766.
Claude Fable 5.1 (High, Default Fallback)Gemini 4 Carbon (Low)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5-1-high/gemini-4-carbon-low · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5-1-high/gemini-4-carbon-low?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill