Claude Fable 5.1 (Medium, Default Fallback) vs Qwen3.7 Plus
Which is better for the money: Claude Fable 5.1 (Medium, Default Fallback) by Anthropic or Qwen3.7 Plus by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Claude Fable 5.1 (Medium, Default Fallb… scores 23.7 points higher (48.9 vs 25.2) but costs 9.3× as much to run the benchmark ($3983 vs $428; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Claude Fable 5.1 (Medium, Default Fallb… when you need intelligence above 25.2, and Qwen3.7 Plus when 25.2 is enough.
| Metric | Claude Fable 5.1 (Medium, Default Fallback) | Qwen3.7 Plus | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 48.9 | 25.2 | −48.5% Qwen3.7 Plus is 48.5% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $3,983.28 | $427.73 | −89.3% Qwen3.7 Plus is 89.3% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 16.18s | 45.52s | +181.3% Qwen3.7 Plus is 181.3% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $10.0 / $50.0 | $0.40 / $1.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Qwen3.7 Plus vs Claude Fable 5.1 (Medium, Default Fallback): 48.5% less intelligence, 89.3% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 181.3% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Fable 5.1 (Medium, Default Fallback) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 55.10 for $3117.
- Qwen3.7 Plus is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
Claude Fable 5.1 (Medium, Default Fallback)Qwen3.7 PlusToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5-1-medium/qwen3-7-plus · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5-1-medium/qwen3-7-plus?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill