Claude Fable 5 (Max, Opus 4.8 Fallback) vs Qwen3.7 Max
Which is better for the money: Claude Fable 5 (Max, Opus 4.8 Fallback) by Anthropic or Qwen3.7 Max by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Claude Fable 5 (Max, Opus 4.8 Fallback) scores 20.1 points higher (49.6 vs 29.5) but costs 4.9× as much to run the benchmark ($11161 vs $2277; both flagship class). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Claude Fable 5 (Max, Opus 4.8 Fallback) when you need intelligence above 29.5, and Qwen3.7 Max when 29.5 is enough.
| Metric | Claude Fable 5 (Max, Opus 4.8 Fallback) | Qwen3.7 Max | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 49.6 | 29.5 | −40.5% Qwen3.7 Max is 40.5% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $11,160.86 | $2,277.12 | −79.6% Qwen3.7 Max is 79.6% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 85.62s | 16.67s | −80.5% Qwen3.7 Max is 80.5% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $10.0 / $50.0 | $2.50 / $7.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Qwen3.7 Max vs Claude Fable 5 (Max, Opus 4.8 Fallback): 40.5% less intelligence, 79.6% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 80.5% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Fable 5 (Max, Opus 4.8 Fallback) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback) scores 57.60 for $8708.
- Qwen3.7 Max is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) scores 53.60 for $2172.
Claude Fable 5 (Max, Opus 4.8 Fallback)Qwen3.7 MaxToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5/qwen3-7-max · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-fable-5/qwen3-7-max?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill