Claude Haiku 5.5 (High) vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Which is better for the money: Claude Haiku 5.5 (High) by Anthropic or Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview by Google? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Claude Haiku 5.5 (High)
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Claude Haiku 5.5 (High): 21.4% less intelligence, 2103.1% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 4.0% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | Claude Haiku 5.5 (High) | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 37.8 | 29.7 | −21.4% Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is 21.4% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $94.07 | $2,072.49 | +2103.1% Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is 22× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 29.47s | 28.29s | −4.0% Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is 4.0% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $2.00 / $12.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Haiku 5.5 (High) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Claude Haiku 5.5 (High)Gemini 3.1 Pro PreviewToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-high/gemini-3-1-pro-preview · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-high/gemini-3-1-pro-preview?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill