Claude Haiku 5.5 (High) vs Gemini 4 Carbon (Medium)
Which is better for the money: Claude Haiku 5.5 (High) by Anthropic or Gemini 4 Carbon (Medium) by Google? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-02.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 4 Carbon (Medium) scores 28.1 points higher (57.7 vs 29.6) but costs 49× as much to run the benchmark ($5903 vs $121; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Gemini 4 Carbon (Medium) when you need intelligence above 29.6, and Claude Haiku 5.5 (High) when 29.6 is enough.
| Metric | Claude Haiku 5.5 (High) | Gemini 4 Carbon (Medium) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 29.6 | 57.7 | +94.9% Gemini 4 Carbon (Medi… is 94.9% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $121.41 | $5,903.03 | +4762.1% Gemini 4 Carbon (Medi… is 49× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 36.00s | Not reported | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $4.00 / $20.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Gemini 4 Carbon (Medium) vs Claude Haiku 5.5 (High): 94.9% more intelligence, 4762.1% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Haiku 5.5 (High) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Gemini 4 Carbon (Medium) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
Claude Haiku 5.5 (High)Gemini 4 Carbon (Medium)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-high/gemini-4-carbon-medium · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-high/gemini-4-carbon-medium?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill