Claude Haiku 5.5 (High) vs GPT-5.6 Terra (Non-reasoning)
Which is better for the money: Claude Haiku 5.5 (High) by Anthropic or GPT-5.6 Terra (Non-reasoning) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Claude Haiku 5.5 (High)
GPT-5.6 Terra (Non-reasoning) vs Claude Haiku 5.5 (High): 45.0% less intelligence, 171.9% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 80.4% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | Claude Haiku 5.5 (High) | GPT-5.6 Terra (Non-reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 37.8 | 20.8 | −45.0% GPT-5.6 Terra (Non-re… is 45.0% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $94.07 | $255.77 | +171.9% GPT-5.6 Terra (Non-re… is 2.7× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 26.02s | 5.09s | −80.4% GPT-5.6 Terra (Non-re… is 80.4% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $2.00 / $12.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Haiku 5.5 (High) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- GPT-5.6 Terra (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
Claude Haiku 5.5 (High)GPT-5.6 Terra (Non-reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-high/gpt-5-6-terra-non-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-high/gpt-5-6-terra-non-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill