Claude Haiku 5.5 (High) vs Granite 4.2 30B
Which is better for the money: Claude Haiku 5.5 (High) by Anthropic or Granite 4.2 30B by IBM? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Claude Haiku 5.5 (High)
Granite 4.2 30B vs Claude Haiku 5.5 (High): 66.4% less intelligence, 17.8% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 38.7% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | Claude Haiku 5.5 (High) | Granite 4.2 30B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 37.8 | 12.7 | −66.4% Granite 4.2 30B is 66.4% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $94.07 | $110.83 | +17.8% Granite 4.2 30B is 17.8% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 26.02s | 36.08s | +38.7% Granite 4.2 30B is 38.7% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $0.16 / $0.65 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Haiku 5.5 (High) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Granite 4.2 30B is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores 37.90 for $110.
Claude Haiku 5.5 (High)Granite 4.2 30BToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-high/granite-4-2-30b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-high/granite-4-2-30b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill