Claude Haiku 5.5 (Low) vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Which is better for the money: Claude Haiku 5.5 (Low) by Anthropic or Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview by Google? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview scores 0.2 points higher (29.7 vs 29.5) but costs 56× as much to run the benchmark ($1935 vs $34.3; premium vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview when you need intelligence above 29.5, and Claude Haiku 5.5 (Low) when 29.5 is enough.
| Metric | Claude Haiku 5.5 (Low) | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 29.5 | 29.7 | +0.7% Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is 0.7% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $34.31 | $1,935.39 | +5540.9% Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is 56× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 11.13s | 24.98s | +124.4% Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is 124.4% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $2.00 / $12.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Claude Haiku 5.5 (Low): 0.7% more intelligence, 5540.9% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 124.4% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Haiku 5.5 (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Medium) scores 29.90 for $31.2.
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Claude Haiku 5.5 (Low)Gemini 3.1 Pro PreviewToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-low/gemini-3-1-pro-preview · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-low/gemini-3-1-pro-preview?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill