Claude Haiku 5.5 (Low) vs Gemini 4 Carbon (Low)
Which is better for the money: Claude Haiku 5.5 (Low) by Anthropic or Gemini 4 Carbon (Low) by Google? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-04.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 4 Carbon (Low) scores 35.6 points higher (54.2 vs 18.6) but costs 145× as much to run the benchmark ($5725 vs $39.6; flagship vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Gemini 4 Carbon (Low) when you need intelligence above 18.6, and Claude Haiku 5.5 (Low) when 18.6 is enough.
| Metric | Claude Haiku 5.5 (Low) | Gemini 4 Carbon (Low) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 18.6 | 54.2 | +191.4% Gemini 4 Carbon (Low) is 2.9× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $39.60 | $5,725.02 | +14357.1% Gemini 4 Carbon (Low) is 145× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 12.18s | 16.28s | +33.7% Gemini 4 Carbon (Low) is 33.7% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $4.00 / $20.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Gemini 4 Carbon (Low) vs Claude Haiku 5.5 (Low): 191.4% more intelligence, 14357.1% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 33.7% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Haiku 5.5 (Low) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Gemini 4 Carbon (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 57.40 for $4766.
Claude Haiku 5.5 (Low)Gemini 4 Carbon (Low)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-low/gemini-4-carbon-low · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-low/gemini-4-carbon-low?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill