Claude Haiku 5.5 (Low) vs GPT-5.5 (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: Claude Haiku 5.5 (Low) by Anthropic or GPT-5.5 (Xhigh) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-5.5 (Xhigh) scores 8.9 points higher (38.4 vs 29.5) but costs 154× as much to run the benchmark ($5294 vs $34.3; flagship vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-5.5 (Xhigh) when you need intelligence above 29.5, and Claude Haiku 5.5 (Low) when 29.5 is enough.
| Metric | Claude Haiku 5.5 (Low) | GPT-5.5 (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 29.5 | 38.4 | +30.2% GPT-5.5 (Xhigh) is 30.2% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $34.31 | $5,294.36 | +15331.0% GPT-5.5 (Xhigh) is 154× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 11.13s | 74.88s | +572.8% GPT-5.5 (Xhigh) is 572.8% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $5.00 / $30.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
GPT-5.5 (Xhigh) vs Claude Haiku 5.5 (Low): 30.2% more intelligence, 15331.0% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 572.8% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Haiku 5.5 (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Medium) scores 29.90 for $31.2.
- GPT-5.5 (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
Claude Haiku 5.5 (Low)GPT-5.5 (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-low/gpt-5-5 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-low/gpt-5-5?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill