Claude Haiku 5.5 (Low) vs GPT-6.1 Terra (Low)
Which is better for the money: Claude Haiku 5.5 (Low) by Anthropic or GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) scores 6.7 points higher (36.2 vs 29.5) but costs 3.3× as much to run the benchmark ($115 vs $34.3; mid-range vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) when you need intelligence above 29.5, and Claude Haiku 5.5 (Low) when 29.5 is enough.
| Metric | Claude Haiku 5.5 (Low) | GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 29.5 | 36.2 | +22.7% GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) is 22.7% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $34.31 | $114.52 | +233.8% GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) is 3.3× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 11.45s | 6.78s | −40.8% GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) is 40.8% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $1.00 / $5.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) vs Claude Haiku 5.5 (Low): 22.7% more intelligence, 233.8% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 40.8% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Haiku 5.5 (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Medium) scores 29.90 for $31.2.
- GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores 37.90 for $110.
Claude Haiku 5.5 (Low)GPT-6.1 Terra (Low)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-low/gpt-6-1-terra-low · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-low/gpt-6-1-terra-low?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill