Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning)
Which is better for the money: Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) by Anthropic or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning) by DeepSeek? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh)
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning) vs Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh): 40.0% less intelligence, 44.1% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 95.8% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 41.2 | 24.7 | −40.0% DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (… is 40.0% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $157.58 | $227.10 | +44.1% DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (… is 44.1% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 69.98s | 2.95s | −95.8% DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (… is 95.8% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $0.30 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh)DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-xhigh/deepseek-v4-1-flash-non-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-xhigh/deepseek-v4-1-flash-non-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill