Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) vs GPT-6.1 Terra (Low)
Which is better for the money: Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) by Anthropic or GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) scores 5.0 points higher (41.2 vs 36.2) but costs 1.4× as much to run the benchmark ($158 vs $115; both mid-range class). Pick Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise GPT-6.1 Terra (Low).
| Metric | Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) | GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 41.2 | 36.2 | −12.1% GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) is 12.1% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $157.58 | $114.52 | −27.3% GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) is 27.3% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 75.35s | 6.78s | −91.0% GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) is 91.0% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $1.00 / $5.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) vs Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh): 12.1% less intelligence, 27.3% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 91.0% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores 37.90 for $110.
Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh)GPT-6.1 Terra (Low)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-xhigh/gpt-6-1-terra-low · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-xhigh/gpt-6-1-terra-low?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill