Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) vs Granite 4.2 30B
Which is better for the money: Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) by Anthropic or Granite 4.2 30B by IBM? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) scores 28.5 points higher (41.2 vs 12.7) but costs 1.4× as much to run the benchmark ($158 vs $111; both mid-range class). Pick Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Granite 4.2 30B.
| Metric | Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) | Granite 4.2 30B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 41.2 | 12.7 | −69.2% Granite 4.2 30B is 69.2% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $157.58 | $110.83 | −29.7% Granite 4.2 30B is 29.7% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 69.98s | 63.69s | −9.0% Granite 4.2 30B is 9.0% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $0.16 / $0.65 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Granite 4.2 30B vs Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh): 69.2% less intelligence, 29.7% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 9.0% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Granite 4.2 30B is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores 37.90 for $110.
Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh)Granite 4.2 30BToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-xhigh/granite-4-2-30b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-xhigh/granite-4-2-30b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill