Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) vs Inkling Small
Which is better for the money: Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) by Anthropic or Inkling Small by Thinking Machines? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh)
Inkling Small vs Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh): 37.6% less intelligence, 52.8% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 78.8% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) | Inkling Small | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 41.2 | 25.7 | −37.6% Inkling Small is 37.6% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $157.58 | $240.85 | +52.8% Inkling Small is 52.8% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 59.82s | 12.67s | −78.8% Inkling Small is 78.8% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $0.30 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Inkling Small is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh)Inkling SmallToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-xhigh/inkling-small · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-xhigh/inkling-small?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill