Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
Which is better for the money: Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) by Anthropic or MiniMax-M3.1-Flash by MiniMax? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash scores 1.5 points higher (42.7 vs 41.2) but costs 1.8× as much to run the benchmark ($283 vs $158; both mid-range class). Pick MiniMax-M3.1-Flash when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh).
| Metric | Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) | MiniMax-M3.1-Flash | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 41.2 | 42.7 | +3.6% MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is 3.6% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $157.58 | $283.18 | +79.7% MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is 79.7% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 71.95s | 22.22s | −69.1% MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is 69.1% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $0.15 / $0.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh): 3.6% more intelligence, 79.7% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 69.1% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh)MiniMax-M3.1-FlashToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-xhigh/minimax-m3-1-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-xhigh/minimax-m3-1-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill