Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) vs Muse Ember (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) by Anthropic or Muse Ember (Xhigh) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-10.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) scores 0.5 points higher (34.6 vs 34.1) but costs 2.0× as much to run the benchmark ($193 vs $95.7; both mid-range class). Pick Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Muse Ember (Xhigh).
| Metric | Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) | Muse Ember (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 34.6 | 34.1 | −1.4% Muse Ember (Xhigh) is 1.4% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $192.70 | $95.73 | −50.3% Muse Ember (Xhigh) is 50.3% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 82.21s | 7.89s | −90.4% Muse Ember (Xhigh) is 90.4% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $0.10 / $0.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Muse Ember (Xhigh) vs Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh): 1.4% less intelligence, 50.3% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 90.4% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Terra (Medium) scores 38.20 for $190.
- Muse Ember (Xhigh) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh)Muse Ember (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-xhigh/muse-ember-xhigh · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-xhigh/muse-ember-xhigh?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill