Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max) vs Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max) by Anthropic or Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) by Anthropic? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max) scores 2.2 points higher (43.4 vs 41.2) but costs 2.1× as much to run the benchmark ($330 vs $158; both mid-range class). Pick Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh).
| Metric | Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max) | Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 43.4 | 41.2 | −5.1% Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhi… is 5.1% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $330.25 | $157.58 | −52.3% Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhi… is 52.3% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 318.48s | 59.82s | −81.2% Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhi… is 81.2% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $0.10 / $0.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) vs Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max): 5.1% less intelligence, 52.3% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 81.2% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max)Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5/claude-haiku-5-5-xhigh · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5/claude-haiku-5-5-xhigh?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill