Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max) vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max)
Which is better for the money: Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max) by Anthropic or DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) by DeepSeek? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max)
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) vs Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max): 17.1% less intelligence, 239.8% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 92.1% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max) | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 43.4 | 36.0 | −17.1% DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 … is 17.1% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $330.25 | $1,122.27 | +239.8% DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 … is 3.4× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 324.30s | 25.65s | −92.1% DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 … is 92.1% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $1.32 / $3.96 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max)DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5/deepseek-v4-pro · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5/deepseek-v4-pro?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill