Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max) vs GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max) by Anthropic or GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 7.6 points higher (51.0 vs 43.4) but costs 2.0× as much to run the benchmark ($662 vs $330; premium vs mid-range cost classes). Pick GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max).
| Metric | Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max) | GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 43.4 | 51.0 | +17.5% GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) is 17.5% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $330.25 | $662.28 | +100.5% GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) is 2.0× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 354.68s | 169.30s | −52.3% GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) is 52.3% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $2.00 / $10.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) vs Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max): 17.5% more intelligence, 100.5% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 52.3% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max)GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5/gpt-6-1-sol-xhigh · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5/gpt-6-1-sol-xhigh?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill