Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max) vs GPT-6 Astra (Low)
Which is better for the money: Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max) by Anthropic or GPT-6 Astra (Low) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6 Astra (Low) scores 2.4 points higher (45.8 vs 43.4) but costs 4.7× as much to run the benchmark ($1537 vs $330; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-6 Astra (Low) when you need intelligence above 43.4, and Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max) when 43.4 is enough.
| Metric | Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max) | GPT-6 Astra (Low) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 43.4 | 45.8 | +5.5% GPT-6 Astra (Low) is 5.5% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $330.25 | $1,536.78 | +365.3% GPT-6 Astra (Low) is 4.7× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 354.68s | 12.66s | −96.4% GPT-6 Astra (Low) is 96.4% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $10.0 / $50.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
GPT-6 Astra (Low) vs Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max): 5.5% more intelligence, 365.3% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 96.4% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- GPT-6 Astra (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max)GPT-6 Astra (Low)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5/gpt-6-astra-low · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5/gpt-6-astra-low?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill