Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max) vs Grok 4.7 (High)
Which is better for the money: Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max) by Anthropic or Grok 4.7 (High) by SpaceXAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Grok 4.7 (High) scores 2.9 points higher (46.3 vs 43.4) but costs 12× as much to run the benchmark ($3881 vs $330; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Grok 4.7 (High) when you need intelligence above 43.4, and Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max) when 43.4 is enough.
| Metric | Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max) | Grok 4.7 (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 43.4 | 46.3 | +6.7% Grok 4.7 (High) is 6.7% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $330.25 | $3,880.88 | +1075.1% Grok 4.7 (High) is 12× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 347.67s | 51.53s | −85.2% Grok 4.7 (High) is 85.2% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Grok 4.7 (High) vs Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max): 6.7% more intelligence, 1075.1% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 85.2% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Grok 4.7 (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 55.10 for $3117.
Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max)Grok 4.7 (High)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5/grok-4-7-high · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5/grok-4-7-high?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill