Claude Opus 4.8 (Max) vs Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning)
Which is better for the money: Claude Opus 4.8 (Max) by Anthropic or Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) by Google? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Claude Opus 4.8 (Max) scores 32.9 points higher (41.8 vs 8.9) but costs 468× as much to run the benchmark ($6874 vs $14.7; flagship vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Claude Opus 4.8 (Max) when you need intelligence above 8.9, and Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) when 8.9 is enough.
| Metric | Claude Opus 4.8 (Max) | Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 41.8 | 8.9 | −78.7% Gemma 4 E4B (Reasonin… is 78.7% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $6,873.86 | $14.68 | −99.8% Gemma 4 E4B (Reasonin… is 99.8% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 36.91s | 57.72s | +56.4% Gemma 4 E4B (Reasonin… is 56.4% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $5.00 / $25.0 | $0.02 / $0.10 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) vs Claude Opus 4.8 (Max): 78.7% less intelligence, 99.8% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 56.4% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Opus 4.8 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
- Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Low) scores 21.50 for $10.6.
Claude Opus 4.8 (Max)Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-4-8/gemma-4-e4b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-4-8/gemma-4-e4b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill