Claude Opus 4.8 (Max) vs GPT-5.5 (High)
Which is better for the money: Claude Opus 4.8 (Max) by Anthropic or GPT-5.5 (High) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Claude Opus 4.8 (Max) scores 4.8 points higher (41.8 vs 37.0) but costs 2.0× as much to run the benchmark ($6874 vs $3411; both flagship class). Pick Claude Opus 4.8 (Max) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise GPT-5.5 (High).
| Metric | Claude Opus 4.8 (Max) | GPT-5.5 (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 41.8 | 37.0 | −11.5% GPT-5.5 (High) is 11.5% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $6,873.86 | $3,410.76 | −50.4% GPT-5.5 (High) is 50.4% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 37.99s | 19.56s | −48.5% GPT-5.5 (High) is 48.5% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $5.00 / $25.0 | $5.00 / $30.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
GPT-5.5 (High) vs Claude Opus 4.8 (Max): 11.5% less intelligence, 50.4% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 48.5% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Opus 4.8 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
- GPT-5.5 (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 55.10 for $3117.
Claude Opus 4.8 (Max)GPT-5.5 (High)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-4-8/gpt-5-5-high · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-4-8/gpt-5-5-high?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill