Claude Opus 5.5 (Medium, Default Fallback) vs Grok 4.6 (Low)
Which is better for the money: Claude Opus 5.5 (Medium, Default Fallback) by Anthropic or Grok 4.6 (Low) by SpaceXAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Claude Opus 5.5 (Medium, Default Fallba… scores 16.1 points higher (51.2 vs 35.1) but costs 2.6× as much to run the benchmark ($1627 vs $614; both premium class). Pick Claude Opus 5.5 (Medium, Default Fallba… when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Grok 4.6 (Low).
| Metric | Claude Opus 5.5 (Medium, Default Fallback) | Grok 4.6 (Low) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 51.2 | 35.1 | −31.4% Grok 4.6 (Low) is 31.4% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,626.81 | $613.92 | −62.3% Grok 4.6 (Low) is 62.3% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 21.80s | 14.47s | −33.6% Grok 4.6 (Low) is 33.6% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $4.00 / $20.0 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Grok 4.6 (Low) vs Claude Opus 5.5 (Medium, Default Fallback): 31.4% less intelligence, 62.3% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 33.6% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Opus 5.5 (Medium, Default Fallback) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Grok 4.6 (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
Claude Opus 5.5 (Medium, Default Fallback)Grok 4.6 (Low)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-5-medium/grok-4-6-low · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-5-medium/grok-4-6-low?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill