Claude Opus 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback) vs Kimi K3 (Low)
Which is better for the money: Claude Opus 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback) by Anthropic or Kimi K3 (Low) by Kimi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Claude Opus 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback) scores 27.5 points higher (57.6 vs 30.1) but costs 7.3× as much to run the benchmark ($8708 vs $1190; flagship vs premium cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Claude Opus 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback) when you need intelligence above 30.1, and Kimi K3 (Low) when 30.1 is enough.
| Metric | Claude Opus 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback) | Kimi K3 (Low) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 57.6 | 30.1 | −47.7% Kimi K3 (Low) is 47.7% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $8,708.20 | $1,190.42 | −86.3% Kimi K3 (Low) is 86.3% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 626.13s | 66.33s | −89.4% Kimi K3 (Low) is 89.4% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $4.00 / $20.0 | $3.00 / $15.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Kimi K3 (Low) vs Claude Opus 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback): 47.7% less intelligence, 86.3% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 89.4% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Opus 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Kimi K3 (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Claude Opus 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback)Kimi K3 (Low)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-5/kimi-k3-low · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-5/kimi-k3-low?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill