Claude Opus 5 (High) vs GPT-6 Astra (Max)
Which is better for the money: Claude Opus 5 (High) by Anthropic or GPT-6 Astra (Max) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6 Astra (Max) scores 4.6 points higher (52.7 vs 48.1) but costs 1.2× as much to run the benchmark ($5324 vs $4332; both flagship class). Pick GPT-6 Astra (Max) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Claude Opus 5 (High).
| Metric | Claude Opus 5 (High) | GPT-6 Astra (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 48.1 | 52.7 | +9.6% GPT-6 Astra (Max) is 9.6% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $4,331.68 | $5,324.10 | +22.9% GPT-6 Astra (Max) is 22.9% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 20.99s | 275.53s | +1212.7% GPT-6 Astra (Max) is 1212.7% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $5.00 / $25.0 | $10.0 / $50.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
GPT-6 Astra (Max) vs Claude Opus 5 (High): 9.6% more intelligence, 22.9% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 1212.7% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Opus 5 (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
- GPT-6 Astra (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
Claude Opus 5 (High)GPT-6 Astra (Max)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-high/gpt-6-astra · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-high/gpt-6-astra?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill