Claude Opus 5 (High) vs Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning)
Which is better for the money: Claude Opus 5 (High) by Anthropic or Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning) by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Claude Opus 5 (High) scores 32.5 points higher (48.1 vs 15.6) but costs 6.6× as much to run the benchmark ($4332 vs $661; flagship vs premium cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Claude Opus 5 (High) when you need intelligence above 15.6, and Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning) when 15.6 is enough.
| Metric | Claude Opus 5 (High) | Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 48.1 | 15.6 | −67.6% Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Re… is 67.6% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $4,331.68 | $661.29 | −84.7% Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Re… is 84.7% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 29.14s | 21.37s | −26.7% Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Re… is 26.7% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $5.00 / $25.0 | $0.40 / $3.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning) vs Claude Opus 5 (High): 67.6% less intelligence, 84.7% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 26.7% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Opus 5 (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
- Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
Claude Opus 5 (High)Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-high/qwen3-5-122b-a10b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-high/qwen3-5-122b-a10b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill